Research
BLOG: lesjoursdeiune.blogspot.com
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY PAGE
How This Blog Researches & Analyzes Digital Governance
About the researcher | Content limitations
Our Documentation Philosophy
This revived blog operates on a simple principle: Context matters more than hot takes. We analyze digital governance through historical, regional, and practical lenses.
Our Three-Pillar Research Framework
1. Historical Context Analysis
"You can't understand where we're going without knowing where we've been."
What we do:
- Trace regulatory concepts back to their origins (often 1990s-early 2000s)
- Document how regulations evolved through multiple internet eras
- Preserve original observations from this blog's archive (1999-2015)
Example in practice:
When analyzing AI regulation, we start with:
- Early internet governance debates (1999-2005)
- Data privacy evolution (2000-2020)
- Current AI framework discussions (2020-2026)
2. Indonesian/ASEAN Grounding
"Global trends, local realities."
Our approach:
- Analyze how international regulations impact/adapt to Southeast Asian contexts
- Document Indonesia's unique regulatory journey
- Compare ASEAN harmonization efforts with other regions
Sources we prioritize:
1. Official Indonesian regulations (UU ITE, POJK, etc.)
2. ASEAN policy documents
3. Local academic research
4. Verified industry reports from Indonesian institutions
3. Practical Impact Focus
"How do regulations actually affect technology adoption?"
Our analysis examines:
- Implementation challenges in developing economies
- Business adaptation strategies
- User behavior changes in response to regulations
- Unintended consequences
Our Research Process (2026+ Content)
Phase 1: Topic Selection
- Must have clear historical evolution
- Must have Indonesian/ASEAN relevance
- Must have practical implications
- Must align with this blog's 27-year observation scope
Phase 2: Source Collection
Primary sources (required):
- Official legal documents
- Government reports
- Regulatory agency publications
Secondary sources (contextual):
- Academic papers (prioritize Indonesian/ASEAN authors)
- Industry analysis from credible firms
- Verified news reporting
Historical context:
- This blog's own archive (1999-2015)
- Wayback Machine captures
- Historical industry publications
Phase 3: Analysis & Writing
Time investment per article:
- 8-15 hours research
- 4-6 hours writing
- 2-3 hours verification
Quality checks:
- Source verification (all links tested)
- Historical accuracy confirmation
- Context balance (local vs global)
- Practical relevance assessment
Our Citation Standards
Required for all contemporary posts:
1. **Primary source links:** Direct to official documents
2. **Date references:** When regulations were enacted/amended
3. **Historical context:** Reference to earlier similar debates
4. **Indonesian perspective:** Local impact analysis
Citation format example:
According to Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK) Regulation No. X/2023
[primary source], implemented in response to similar EU frameworks but adapted for
ASEAN market realities. This continues evolution from earlier approaches documented
in this blog's 2008 archive [historical reference].
Transparency & Corrections
Content Dating System:
- 1999-2025: Original archive content, preserved unchanged
- 2026+: New analysis with contemporary research
Update Policy:
- Regular content reviewed annually
- Significant regulatory changes trigger updates
- Update dates clearly displayed
Correction Process:
1. Error reports to: lesjours.methodology[at]gmail.com
2. Verification within 72 hours
3. Correction notice added to content
4. Appreciation acknowledged to reporter
What We Don't Do
❌ Predictive analysis ("This will definitely happen")
❌ Political advocacy (Supporting/opposing specific policies)
❌ Consulting services (Paid analysis for specific entities)
❌ Breaking news reporting (We analyze trends, not events)
What We Do Provide
✅ Historical context for current debates
✅ Regional perspective often missing in global analysis
✅ Longitudinal observation (27 years and counting)
✅ Practical implications for businesses and users
This methodology ensures:
1. Consistent quality across revived content
2. Credible sourcing and verification
3. Transparent research processes
4. Valuable perspective for readers
Methodology established: February 1, 2026
Based on 27 years of observation practice
Comments
Post a Comment